Goa Legislative Assembly

गोवा विधानसभा

Shri. Francisco Sardinha

Shri. Francisco Sardinha

Constituency No: 31
Constituency Name: Curtorim

Indian National Congress

General:

Date of Birth: 15th April 1946
Email: -NA-
FAX: -NA-

Contact:

Official: -NA-
Residence: -NA-
Personal: -NA-

Address:

Office: Ungirim, Curtorim, Salcete, Goa
Permanent: -NA-
Present: -NA-
View Previous Elections Result
Assembly Constituency Party Votes Polled Votes Received Won By

Fourth Legislative Assembly 2002

12 Jun 2002 to 8 Jun 2007

Curtorim

Indian National Congress

15804

8907

2851

Indian National Congress

Third Legislative Assembly 1999

6 Jun 1999 to 31 May 2002

Curtorim

Indian National Congress

0

0

0

Indian National Congress

First Legislative Assembly 1990

5 Dec 1989 to 15 Dec 1994

Curtorim

Indian National Congress

12958

8876

4940

Indian National Congress

Sixth Legislative Assembly of Goa Daman & Diu-1985

Curtorim

Indian National Congress

13881

9452

5665

Indian National Congress

Fifth Legislative Assembly Of Goa, Daman & Diu-1980

Curtorim

Indian National Congress

11308

7418

4857

Indian National Congress

Fourth Legislative Assembly Of Goa, Daman & Diu-1977

Curtorim

Indian National Congress

0

0

0

Indian National Congress
Fourth Legislative Assembly 2002
Speaker
(8 Jul 2005 to 11 Jun 2007)
Third Legislative Assembly 1999
Chief Minister
(Since 24 Nov 1999)
Third Legislative Assembly 1999
Leader of Opposition
(31 Oct 2000 to 12 Dec 2000)
Fourth Legislative Assembly 2002
CHAIRMAN
Estimates Committee
Fourth Legislative Assembly 2002
CHAIRMAN
Rules Committee
Fourth Legislative Assembly 2002
CHAIRMAN
Business Advisory Committee
Third Legislative Assembly 1999
CHAIRMAN
Public Accounts Committee
Third Legislative Assembly 1999
MEMBER
Business Advisory Committee
Third Legislative Assembly 1999
MEMBER
Rules Committee
Third Legislative Assembly 1999
MEMBER
Committee on Delegated Legislation
First Legislative Assembly 1990
CHAIRMAN
Committee on Public Undertakings
First Legislative Assembly 1990
MEMBER
Committee On Petitions

Bill No. 3 of 2000 (Government Bill)

The Goa Barge Tax (Amendment)Bill,2000

22 Mar 2000

30 Mar 2000

12 May 2000

pdfBill As Passed 36.24 KB

Bill No. 1 of 2000 (Government Bill)

The Goa Supplementary Appropriation Bill,2000

23 Mar 2000

23 Mar 2000

28 Mar 2000

pdfBill As Introduced 141.18 KBpdfBill As Passed 140.97 KB

Bill No. 14 of 2000 (Government Bill)

The Goa Sales Tax(Amendment)Bill,2000

30 Mar 2000

30 Mar 2000

11 May 2000

pdfBill As Introduced 261.50 KBpdfBill As Passed 39.89 KB

Bill No. 13 of 2000 (Government Bill)

The Goa Sales Tax, Luxury Tax and Entertainment Tax -(Settlement of Arrears) Bill,2000

30 Mar 2000

30 Mar 2000

11 May 2000

pdfBill As Passed 446.62 KB

Bill No. 12 of 2000 (Government Bill)

The Goa Tax on Luxuries(Hotels and Lodging Houses)(Amendment)Bill,2000

30 Mar 2000

30 Mar 2000

12 May 2000

pdfBill As Introduced 403.79 KB

Ruling of the Speaker On proceedings of the Question hour.

As all of you are aware that under Article 194 of the Constitution of India the freedom their limits the chair is empowered to regulate. Now a days it has become a common phenomena that during course of speech is guaranteed to the Members of Legislature. Sometimes while speaking on the Floor of the House there will be uproars and exchange of words between the Treasury Branch and the Opposition. While doing so if, anybody transgress discussion heated arguments take place and while doing so, in my opinion any particular word or words used in debate are found defamatory, indecent, unparliamentary or undignified, I order that such words cannot be published or telecast.

In the past, inspite of orders of the Chair the electronic media has telecasted all proceedings without editing the portion which are not permitted.

 I may bring to the notice of the press and electronic media that henceforth such violation will have to be treated as contempt of the House.

 I also order that henceforth electronic media should telecast only the proceedings of the Question hour.

Date : 13 Jul 2006

Ruling of the Speaker on Discharge of Duties

I wish to bring to the notice of the House that it is the duty of the Speaker to preserve the orderly conduct of debates. I need not emphasize that the Speaker is empowered to regulate the disorder in the House. If there is grave disorder in the House the Speaker is forced to take appropriate action to bring the House in order. While doing so, the Speaker is bound to give Rulings/Decisions deemed fit. The interpretation of Rules as well as their application to specific situation and circumstances is the prerogative of the Speaker. With respect to the discharge of duties, powers and functions, the Speaker is not answerable and is not expected to give reasons for his decisions which cannot be challenged by any Member. I would like to bring to the notice of the House that Members cannot use offensive expression, attributing motives to the chair. Any such expressions are deprecated. If anybody disregards the authority and the chair, the Speaker is forced to take action as per Rules.

 Briefly speaking the powers of the Speaker are of the following category

1) Administrative powers

2) Regulatory powers

 3) Censoring powers

4) Supervisory powers

5) Judicial powers

6) Police powers

7) Residuary powers

I may also make a mention that Speaker can regulate the issue of passes to the official gallery, public gallery, press gallery etc. The regulatory power of Legislature vests with the Speaker. As such I have exercised my regulatory power and took a decision to restrict telecasting the proceedings of the House. The matter of telecasting the proceedings of the House in the State legislatures is still under consideration. 

My decision on the above issue has been questioned by Leader of the Opposition which is reported in the Gomantak Times (Daily)  on  14/7/2006  under  the  caption  “Speaker  restricts electronic media coverage”. In the said Article it is mentioned

 that   “Leader   of   Opposition  Shri   Manohar  Parrikar  later describes the order as arbitrary, unilateral, dictatorial and undemocratic”. According to the well-established Parliamentary Practice and Procedure the decision of the Speaker is unquestionable. In this connection I quote from Practice and Procedure of Parliament (fifth Edition) page 278-

 S peeches or writings reflecting on the House, its Committee or Members: amounts to Breach of privilege and contempt of the House.Examples of speeches and writings which have been held to constitute breach of privilege and contempt of the House may be categorized as under-

Reflections on the House

Reflections  on  the  character  and  impartiality  of  the

 Speaker in the discharge of his duty. 

Reflection on Members in the execution of their duties Reflection on Members serving on a Committee of the House. Reflections on the Conduct of the Chairman of a Committee of the House.

the instant case impartiality of the Speaker has been questioned  which  amounts  to  casting  aspersions  on  the Speaker as well as the House. 

As such the Leader of Opposition being seasoned Parliamentarian is not expected to go to the press and make comments on the decision of the Speaker.

Date : 17 Jul 2006

Ruling of the Speaker on Financial Powers

“I would like to make a small observation  which  is  in  no  way  connected  to  the Supplementary Demands. I quote from Kaul and Shakdhar, Page 1023. The Budget estimates are forwarded to the Ministry of Finance for incorporation in the Union Budget, as a matter of course. The estimates are not subject to any examination by any, I am talking about what is happening in the Lok Sabha, so same thing I am requesting should happen in the Legislature Secretariat. I am just reading the Clause. Sir, the Budget estimates are forwarded to the Ministry of Finance for the incorporation in the Union Budget, as a matter of course. The estimates are not subject to any examination by any Departmental  Committee of  the Ministry of  Finance or  any other Committee of Parliament. In case the Ministry of Finance has any suggestion to make, it is submitted to the Speaker for his consideration and, broadly speaking a final decision acceptable to both is arrived at after discussion. In the unlikely event of any difference of opinion between the Speaker and the Ministry of Finance, the decision of the Speaker would normally prevail as it is for him to decide what is necessary for the Lok Sabha and its Secretariat in the efficient discharge of its responsibilities. Based on the Parliamentary Procedure the financial autonomy and Independent status is required to the Legislature Secretariat on par with Parliament and High Courts. We may dispense with the procedure of obtaining the approval of Director of Accounts. Instead we can appoint an Internal Financial Advisor, whose function is to conduct internal audit to authorize payment and maintain accounts of the Assembly Secretariat. I hope the House agrees with my views. If need be, the Government may take action to promulgate an Ordinance to accord Independent status and Financial status to the Legislature Secretariat”.

Date : 31 Jul 2006